A Bold Comment Sparks City PrideIndiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham caused a stir when she questioned the excitement levels around Cleveland and Detroit being chosen as locations for future WNBA teams. She expressed uncertainty about how enthusiastic players and fans would truly be in those two cities, suggesting alternatives like Miami, Nashville, or Kansas City instead .
Cleveland and Detroit Push Back
Both Cleveland and Detroit responded swiftly. Cleveland shared a glowing clip of Fever teammate Caitlin Clark praising its vibrant sports culture during the 2024 Final Four, while Detroit recalled the success of the Detroit Shock—highlighting record-setting attendance and its status as a fierce sports hub.
Players’ Insight vs. Expansion Strategy
Cunningham emphasized that expansion decisions should reflect what players actually want—where they’d be excited to play and which markets can sustain fan engagement. Her candid perspective also raised a broader question: is the WNBA expanding too quickly? .
Why the Back-and-Forth Is Constructive
Even though Cunningham’s tone seemed dismissive, the ensuing debate has channeled attention to the strengths of these Midwestern cities. Cleveland and Detroit are now getting a spotlight on their rich sports histories and passionate fan bases, which could help build momentum ahead of new WNBA franchises .
A Conversation That Benefits the League
This exchange isn’t just drama—it’s a valuable discussion. It brings visibility to why some markets justify expansion, turns constructive critique into community pride, and keeps fans and cities engaged. The conversation reflects the healthy tension between player viewpoints and franchise ambitions—and that dynamic could pave the way for more thoughtful, successful growth of the WNBA.
About the Author
